Dependent Contractors, Exclusivity & Reasonable Notice

Introduction Contractors in law are distinct from employees. Employees are entitled to a reasonable period of notice if the relationship is terminated by the employer. This is an implied term of any contract of employment at common law. A contractor is usually considered as being independent meaning that they control their work, use their own […]

Rolling Limitation Periods in Contract Litigation

Introduction The usual rule is that once an event occurs which triggers a possible legal action, the limitation period in which to do so commences and runs from that occurrence.  A rolling limitation period is one that resets as a result of a recurring obligation by the defendant. The issue is not whether the plaintiff […]

Anticipatory Breach of Contract and the Limitations Act

Introduction An anticipatory breach of contract occurs where one party to a contract expresses, or it becomes clear by the circumstances, that they are not going to perform on the due date. The innocent party may accept the repudiation when it occurs and seek damages, or instead, wait until the performance was contractually due and […]

Do Courts Have the Discretion to Override Arbitration Clauses?

Contracting parties normally have their remedy for breaches through the court process. However, they may agree in advance to have any differences that arise resolved through mandatory and binding arbitration. Section 7(1) of the Ontario Arbitration Act (the “Act“) allows a party of such an agreement, if the other commences a lawsuit, to apply to […]

Recent Uber Decision Revisits The Use of Arbitration Clauses

With Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal (ONCA) kicked 2019 off with a decision that will likely have long-lasting implications beyond the parties involved. The case scrutinized an arbitration clause included in all agreements that Uber has with its drivers (who the company also claims are independent contractors, not employees). The ONCA ruled that […]

Market Pressures on Contractual Obligations

We have all envied, or maybe abhorred, the skilled professional athlete who suddenly demands, and receives a contract enhancement or extension. The impetus is often some other similar athlete being awarded an extravagant sum in contractual negotiations which alters the fair market value of the contracts in that sport. Well, if it works in professional […]

Unjust Enrichment in Civil Litigation

Unjust enrichment is an equitable cause of action. It stems from an ancient principle that no person should be allowed to benefit (be enriched) at another’s expense (deprivation) without there being some valid reason in law for this to have occurred.  The remedy is made in equity through a restoration (restitution). In effect, the benefit […]

Exit mobile version