Garnishment can be a powerful debt collection method by which a creditor can satisfy a judgment it obtains against a debtor. It is commonly used in the context of employment, where a debtor’s employer must turn over a portion of the debtor’s wages to the creditor. However, it can also be used in other contexts […]
Category Archives: Debt Collection Enforcement
Corporate Attribution in a Bankruptcy Context
We previously wrote about the doctrine of corporate attribution in the context of bankruptcy in Ernst & Young Inc. v. Aquino. This decision was followed by another decision of the Court of Appeal in Golden Oaks Enterprises Inc. v. Scott, which also concerned bankruptcy. One of the primary issues before the Court of Appeal in […]
Court Considers Penalties Against Judgment Debtor for Contempt of Court
Enforcement against judgment debtors often requires recourse to Rule 60 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. The Rule sets out various enforcement mechanisms, including writs of seizure, sale, and garnishment. Rule 60.18 also sets out how a judgment creditor may examine a debtor about their income and property, also known as an examination in aid […]
Pandemic Equipment Business Tries to Back Out of Promissory Note
Getting into a business arrangement with a new partner can be an exciting time, with the prospect of new opportunities and successes on the horizon. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that a new business is structured correctly to maximize success. However, from time to time, business deals may not go as planned, and disputes […]
Fraud, Letters of Credit & the Autonomy Principle
A standby letter of credit is a promise from a bank to a creditor that the bank will pay funds to the creditor in the event of a default by a debtor, so long as certain conditions are met. For example, a commercial landlord may require a standby letter of credit from a tenant’s bank […]
The Anti-Deprivation Rule, Part 1: Fraud in Bankruptcy
Protecting or preserving assets during a time of insolvency is a natural temptation of debtors. Some even take a proactive approach and design contractual terms that aim to do much the same should insolvency ever arise in the future. However, when such terms are exercised, they run into possibly infringing the “anti-deprivation” rule. What is […]
The Presumption of Undue Influence
The equitable doctrine of undue influence is there to prevent one person from taking advantage of their position of power and authority over another person. This inequity in power between parties can vitiate the weaker party’s consent to an agreement, as they were unable to freely exercise their independent will. In other words, they would […]
What Constitutes a Fraudulent Conveyance?
The recent case of Anisman v. Drabinsky is a summary judgment decision from the Ontario Superior Court (ONSC) with guidance for creditors on how to approach issues relating to discoverability and limitation periods if they suspect their debtors’ real property has been fraudulently conveyed. Debtor Transfers Property to Spouse for Nominal Amount The plaintiff, a […]
Judgment Debts, Fraud and Bankruptcy
Many people assume that bankruptcy protects them from all creditors, across the board, however, this is not the case. In certain circumstances, debts may still be enforced even after a discharge in bankruptcy. When a creditor sues a debtor and a judgment is awarded, this judgment may survive an assignment into bankruptcy in certain circumstances. […]
Mortgage Enforcement and Penalties
Introduction The general commercial practice for lenders is to include a contractual term imposing a greater interest rate if the loan goes into arrears. This is both an incentive and a deterrent. The borrower is motivated to keep the loan from defaulting and is, therefore, more likely to pay on time to prevent the increased […]