Parties to civil proceedings in Ontario are permitted to bring into the litigation all persons they feel should be present to effectively and completely adjudicate on all the issues raised and who fit the criteria set out in the Rules of Civil Procedure. Those who are named as defendants can bring additional parties in through […]
Category Archives: Complex Corporate Commercial Litigation
The Duty of Good Faith in Contracts, Further Defined
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) established a duty of good faith in contractual performance in its precedent-setting 2014 decision of Bhasin v. Hrynew. In this decision, the court recognized an organizing principle of good faith which contractual parties must observe in order to perform their contractual duties honestly and reasonably and not capriciously. Since […]
Objections to, and the Assumption of, Forum Conveniens or Non-Conveniens
There are many aspects of litigation to consider when bringing a claim, but perhaps first and foremost is where to bring the claim. It may seem obvious in most cases, but litigants are not always located in the same geographic area. Further, the issue in question might have occurred in a location where neither party […]
The Importance of a Comprehensive Shareholder Agreement
The existence of a carefully thought-out shareholder’s agreement can go a long way to avoiding costly and time-consuming litigation. Shareholder agreements can set out the terms for various transactions in advance, determine how shareholders and directors are appointed, and a variety of other issues that will be faced by most shareholders over a corporation’s lifetime. […]
Waiver of Tort as a Cause of Action or the Remedy for Disgorgement?
There has been an ongoing controversy in Canada’s courts over whether the doctrine of ‘waiver of tort’ was sufficient to create a cause of action on its own. The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) had briefly considered the issue in Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v Microsoft Corporation, however, this decision did not end the debate, since […]
The Duties of Good Faith & Honest Performance
The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) originally created a duty of “good faith in contractual performance” in its 2014 decision of Bhasin v. Hrynew. In the decision, the SCC recognized an organizing principle of good faith that parties generally must observe in order to perform their contractual duties honestly and reasonably and not capriciously or […]
Fraud, Letters of Credit & the Autonomy Principle
A standby letter of credit is a promise from a bank to a creditor that the bank will pay funds to the creditor in the event of a default by a debtor, so long as certain conditions are met. For example, a commercial landlord may require a standby letter of credit from a tenant’s bank […]
Commercial Tenant Prevented From Using Force Majeure to Escape Rent Obligations
We wrote about the issues of frustration and force majeure in our previous post called “Force Majeure and Frustration in Contracts Following the COVID-19 Pandemic” Force majeure clauses are dealt with through the law of contract. Such a clause needs to be an express term and will not be implied. These clauses act as a […]
The Anti-Deprivation Rule Pt. 2: SCC Confirms Test
Last week we visited the primary legal authorities in Ontario on fraud in the event of a bankruptcy, and the anti-deprivation rule. Recently the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC), in Chandos Construction Ltd. v. Deloitte Restructuring Inc., 2020, confirmed the reasoning of those cases. Did an Insolvency Penalty Clause Contradict the Anti-Deprivation Rule? A general […]
The Anti-Deprivation Rule, Part 1: Fraud in Bankruptcy
Protecting or preserving assets during a time of insolvency is a natural temptation of debtors. Some even take a proactive approach and design contractual terms that aim to do much the same should insolvency ever arise in the future. However, when such terms are exercised, they run into possibly infringing the “anti-deprivation” rule. What is […]