Volunteer directors play a critical role in the governance and success of non-profit organizations across Ontario. From charities and community associations to professional bodies and advocacy groups, these individuals often dedicate significant time and expertise without financial compensation. While the position may be unpaid, the legal responsibilities associated with it are very real. A common and important question arises: can volunteer directors be held personally liable for the organization’s actions?
The short answer is yes: under certain circumstances, volunteer directors may face personal liability. However, the scope of that liability is nuanced and shaped by statutory protections, common law principles, and the specific facts of each case.
Directors of non-profit organizations, whether incorporated federally or provincially, are responsible for overseeing the management of the organization and ensuring that it operates in accordance with its governing documents and applicable laws. In Ontario, many non-profits are governed by the Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (ONCA), while federally incorporated organizations are subject to the Canada Not-for-profit Corporations Act (CNCA).
Despite the absence of compensation, volunteer directors are not held to a lesser legal standard than their counterparts in for-profit corporations. Courts have consistently emphasized that accepting a directorship entails assuming a position of trust and responsibility. Directors must act in the best interests of the organization and exercise appropriate oversight over its affairs.
This means that volunteer directors cannot take a passive role. Even when day-to-day operations are delegated to management or staff, directors are expected to remain informed and engaged in decision-making. Failure to do so may expose them to claims of professional negligence or breach of duty.
At the core of director liability are two fundamental legal obligations: the fiduciary duty and the duty of care.
The fiduciary duty requires directors to act honestly, in good faith, and in the best interests of the organization. This includes avoiding conflicts of interest, refraining from self-dealing, and ensuring that personal interests do not interfere with decision-making. In the non-profit context, this duty is particularly important given that organizations often serve public or community-oriented purposes.
The duty of care requires directors to exercise the level of care, diligence, and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. This is an objective standard. Volunteer status does not lower the expectation of competence or attentiveness.
Courts will assess whether directors made informed decisions, sought appropriate advice when necessary, and considered relevant risks. A failure to meet this standard may result in personal liability, particularly where the organization suffers harm as a result.
While the corporate structure of a non-profit generally shields directors from liability for the organization’s obligations, there are several important exceptions where personal liability may arise.
One of the most common areas is statutory liability. Various federal and provincial statutes impose direct obligations on directors, including liability for unpaid employee wages, source deductions, and certain tax obligations. For example, under employment standards legislation, directors may be held personally liable for up to a prescribed amount of unpaid wages or vacation pay.
Similarly, tax legislation may impose liability where a corporation fails to remit payroll deductions such as income tax, CPP contributions, or EI premiums. Directors who fail to take reasonable steps to prevent such defaults may be pursued personally by tax authorities.
Environmental and occupational health and safety legislation also creates potential exposure. Directors may be liable if they fail to ensure that the organization complies with regulatory requirements, particularly where there is evidence of negligence or willful disregard for safety obligations.
Beyond statutory liability, directors may face claims for breach of fiduciary duty or negligence. For instance, if a director authorizes improper use of funds, fails to disclose a conflict of interest, or neglects to oversee financial management, they may be held personally accountable.
In some cases, courts may “pierce the corporate veil” where the organization is used as a vehicle for improper conduct. While this is relatively rare, it underscores the importance of acting transparently and in good faith.
Canadian courts recognize that directors must often make complex decisions under conditions of uncertainty. To account for this, the “business judgment rule” provides a degree of deference to board decisions.
Under this principle, courts generally will not second-guess decisions made by directors if they were made honestly, prudently, and on an informed basis. This protection applies equally to volunteer directors of non-profits.
However, the business judgment rule is not a blanket shield. It does not protect directors who fail to inform themselves adequately, ignore obvious risks, or act in bad faith. The rule reinforces the importance of process: documenting deliberations, seeking expert advice where appropriate, and ensuring that decisions are grounded in reasonable analysis.
Recognizing the importance of volunteer governance, legislators have introduced certain protections to limit personal liability in appropriate circumstances.
Both the ONCA and CNCA provide defences for directors who exercise due diligence. This means that a director may avoid liability if they can demonstrate that they took all reasonable steps to prevent the misconduct or default in question.
Reliance on professional advice is another important defence. Directors are generally entitled to rely in good faith on financial statements, reports, and opinions provided by qualified professionals such as accountants, auditors, or legal counsel.
Some statutes also provide limited immunity for volunteer directors of charitable organizations, particularly where actions are taken in good faith and without gross negligence. However, these protections are not absolute and will not apply in cases involving reckless or intentional misconduct.
To mitigate risk, many non-profit organizations provide indemnification to their directors. Indemnification provisions, typically set out in the organization’s bylaws, allow the organization to reimburse directors for legal costs and liabilities incurred in the course of their duties, provided certain conditions are met.
In addition, Directors’ and Officers’ (D&O) liability insurance is a critical tool for risk management. These policies can cover defence costs, settlements, and judgments arising from claims against directors.
However, coverage is not unlimited. Policies may exclude certain types of misconduct, such as fraud or intentional wrongdoing, and may contain limits and deductibles. Directors should ensure that appropriate coverage is in place and understand the scope of that coverage.
Volunteer directors can take proactive measures to reduce their exposure to personal liability while fulfilling their governance responsibilities effectively.
Directors should ensure that they understand the organization’s governing documents, including its articles, bylaws, and policies. Familiarity with these documents provides a foundation for informed decision-making.
Maintaining accurate and comprehensive records is essential. Board minutes should reflect the deliberations and rationale behind key decisions. This documentation can be invaluable in demonstrating that directors acted prudently and in good faith.
Directors should actively monitor the organization’s financial health and compliance with legal obligations. Regular review of financial statements, budgets, and audit reports can help identify potential issues before they escalate.
Where uncertainty arises, seeking professional advice is a prudent step. Legal and financial advisors can provide guidance on complex issues and help ensure that decisions are made in accordance with applicable laws.
Serving as a volunteer director is both a privilege and a responsibility. While there is potential for personal liability, it should not deter qualified individuals from contributing their expertise to non-profit organizations. The legal framework in Ontario and across Canada seeks to strike a balance between accountability and protection, ensuring that directors are held to appropriate standards while recognizing the value of volunteer service.
By understanding their duties, remaining engaged in governance, and taking reasonable precautions, volunteer directors can significantly reduce their risk of personal liability. In most cases, liability arises not from honest mistakes but from inattention, lack of oversight, or failure to act when action is required.
The commercial litigation lawyers at Milosevic & Associates have extensive experience advising directors and officers on governance risks, fiduciary duties, and liability exposure. We assist clients with proactive risk management, internal investigations, and the defence of claims involving breach of duty, statutory liability, and shareholder disputes.
If you are concerned about your exposure as a director or have already been named in a claim, contact Milosevic & Associates online or call (416) 916-1387 for strategic, practical legal guidance. The firm’s skilled litigation team will work with you to assess your risk, protect your interests, and help you move forward with confidence.
© 2026 Milosevic & Associates. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy / Disclaimer. Website designed and managed by Umbrella Legal Marketing